Document review
Review with
judgment.
Quality, consistency, and defensibility — guided by experienced judgment, AI-enabled workflows, and deep Relativity expertise.
[ INTRO ]
Where the case
actually gets built.
Every privilege call, every responsiveness decision, every redaction is a legal decision — and they compound.
We treat review the way it deserves: as the place where the
case is shaped, not just where documents move through a pipeline.
[ Why it matters ]
Inconsistent review creates
downstream risk.
When review quality drifts, productions get challenged, privilege gets waived, and costs spiral. A protocol-led, well-calibrated review prevents the most common — and most expensive — review failures before they happen.
[ What We Do ]
A review process designed
around the matter.
We design review around the legal goals of each case — not around staffing capacity:
[ a DIFFERENT approach ]
Protocol-led, not staffing-led.
Other Approaches
Staffing-Led
- Staffing-driven and headcount-focused
- Junior reviewers make consequential calls
- Technology applied without strategic oversight
- QC added at the end, if at all
Larimer Law
Protocol-Led
- Designed around the legal issues
- Senior expertise calibrates from day one
- AI-enabled review and analytics, applied with judgment
- Deep Relativity expertise integrated throughout
- QC and defensibility built in
[
Where This Matters Most
]
The matters where review quality
compounds.
A protocol-led approach matters most when: